ABOUT CHINA

 

China’s Secret Weapon: Changing the Meaning of “Human Rights”


For the first time in history, a Chinese Foreign Minister addressed the UN Human Rights Council. His speech was a textbook example of Orwellian “newspeak.”

by Massimo Introvigne

In 2020, China was elected as a member of the UN Human Rights Council for the term 2021–2023. It looked like a joke, the proverbial putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. However, many did not understand how China planned to use this position. Most comments pointed to the fact that China will be there to torpedo any investigation of human rights violation by the CCP and by the many non-democratic countries whose votes propelled Beijing to the paradoxical position. This is certainly not untrue. But there is more, as the world discovered this week at the 46th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.

For the first time in history, a Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, addressed (via video, because of COVID-19) the Human Rights Council. The Foreign Ministry spokesperson celebrated the event on February 22, stating that the fact that China has been voted into the Council “testifies to the international community’s recognition of China’s human rights cause.” In fact, it testifies to a basic fact well-known to all scholars of the field, that the majority of the world’s countries do not respect human rights and do not want the UN to investigate them. They elected the world’s worst perpetrator of human rights violations hoping that, by protecting itself, China will protect them as well.

READ MORE

FROM THE WORLD

 

The Belgian Case Against the Jehovah’s Witnesses: The Bible in the Dock?


A criminal court in Ghent is called to examine how the Jehovah’s Witnesses deal with some of their ex-members. They maintain they just follow the Scripture.

by Willy Fautré

On 16 February, a trial started against the Christian Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (CCJW) at the criminal court of Ghent (East Flanders) on the alleged grounds of discrimination and incitement to hatred with a particular focus on their shunning (ostracization) practice in cases of disfellowshipping (exclusion) and disassociation (voluntary resignation).

A former Jehovah’ Witness who had voluntarily left the movement in 2011, filed a criminal complaint against the CCJW in 2015, and managed to have it supported by over a dozen more former Jehovah’s Witnesses. Four lawyers pleaded for the claimants when the first instance court opened the hearing. Their counsel took two hours and a half for presenting their arguments and the situation of their clients about their alleged family ostracization. Their plea was supported by the lawyer of UNIA, an inter-federal independent public institution financed by public money that fights discrimination and racism and promotes equal opportunities. 

READ MORE

Other Spend Billions for Their Lies: Would You Donate A Few Dollars for the Truth?

Bitter Winter launches a donation campaign to survive and thrive –
we need your help, now.
Donate and support us!
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
Email
Email
YouTube
YouTube
Copyright © 2021 Bitter Winter, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
Bitter Winter
Via Confienza 19
Torino, To 10121
Italy

Add us to your address book