Thank you for the opportunity to speak about organ pillaging in China
and to offer some proposals for more responsible policies among its
In 2004, Gao Zhisheng, then one of China’s top lawyers and since
nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, defended a Falun Gong
practitioner who had been sent to a labour camp without any form of
hearing. Gao (a Christian), learning that the court had refused to
hear the case because of “orders from above”, wrote to the National
People's Congress and later to the top leadership in Beijing. He spoke
of the investigation he had made into the persecution of Falun Gong,
of learning of the "indescribable violence done to our kind people",
and of how spending a dozen days interviewing Falun Gong practitioners
was a "shocking experience".
Gao's permit to practise law was subsequently removed and his office
was closed by the government. His wife and daughter were harassed by
police before finally in despair fleeing the country. He was
imprisoned and tortured during a horrific five-week period and is now
being "held incommunicado at an unknown location", according to
Forced Labour Camps
David Matas and I visited about a dozen countries to interview Falun
Gong practitioners sent to forced labour camps, who managed later to
leave the camps and the country itself. They told us of working in
appalling conditions for up to sixteen hours daily with no pay, little
food, being cramped together on the floor for sleeping, and being
tortured. They made export products, ranging from clothing to
chopsticks to Christmas decorations at times as subcontractors to
The camps, which were created in the Mao era and modeled closely on
those in Stalin’s Russia and Hitler’s Third Reich, allow the Party to
send anyone to them for up to four years with no form of hearing or
appeal. One estimate of the number of the camps across China as of
2005 was 340, having a capacity of about 300,000 inmates. In 2007, a
US government report estimated that at least half of the inmates in
the camps were Falun Gong. It is the combination of totalitarian
governance and 'anything is permitted' or 'carnivore' economics that
allows such frankly barbaric practices to persist.
Consider Falun Gong practitioner Crystal Chen, for example, the
assistant to the head of a large import/export company and amateur
actress, who spent three years in a camp. Her experiences with
beatings, being shackled and stretched, and prolonged sleep
deprivation include this incident. In the Tianhe detention centre, she
was thrown on the floor of her cell and four large men held her down.
A one-pound bag of salt was poured in a bottle and a small amount of
water added. Guards shoved the opening against Chen’s teeth and tried
to pry her mouth open with a dirty toothbrush. She resisted, knowing
the salt could kill her. Chen: “The salt went everywhere into my mouth
and up my nose...I vomited salt and blood for the following days and
could not eat. My gums were full of blood, I could hardly talk.” A
male practitioner, university teacher Gao Xianmin, died after being
subjected to the same salt torture.
Despite all, Chen stresses that Falun Gong practitioners, while
understandably unsympathetic towards the Party, seek no role in
Chinese politics- "only to stop the persecution which has continued
for more than ten years... I love China, I'm proud of thousands of
years of Chinese civilization and proud of being Chinese...I look
forward to the renaissance of genuine Chinese values and dignity,
including truthfulness, compassion and tolerance.
Killing of Falun Gong practitioners for their organs
David Matas, a respected Canadian lawyer, and I came to the dismaying
conclusion that Falun Gong practitioners in China have been and are
being killed for their organs on a large scale. We wrote a report that
came to this conclusion, which came out in July 2006. There was a
second version in 2007. A third in book form was published last month
as Bloody Harvest.
Falun Gong is a Chinese spiritual discipline with principles for
living, meditation and gentle exercises which began only in 1992. The
government encouraged it initially as beneficial for health. By 1999,
it had grown so popular that the Party became afraid that its own
numerical and ideological supremacy might be threatened. The persons
in all walks of life practising had grown from virtually none in 1992,
according to a government estimate, to 70-100 million persons across
China. It was accordingly banned and has been demonized in the party
media with all manner of untruths continuously since 1999.
Practitioners were asked to recant. Those who refused and continued
the practice and those who protested the banning were arrested. If
they recanted after arrest, they were released. If they did not, they
were tortured. If they recanted after torture, they were then
released. If they did not recant after torture, they disappeared into
the detention and forced labour system.
Our conclusion is that many of the disappeared were killed for their
organs, which were sold to transplant tourists. It would take too
much time to set out how we came to that conclusion. We invite you to
read our report, which is on the Internet (accessible at
www.david-kilgour.com), or our book.
Briefly, two of the dozens of evidentiary trails we followed which led
to our conclusion are these:
1) Only Falun Gong practitioners in work camps and prisons are
systematically blood tested and physically examined. This testing
cannot be motivated by concerns over the health of practitioners,
because they are also systematically tortured. Testing is necessary
for organ transplants because of the need for blood type compatibility
between the organ source and the recipient. Crystal Chen, for example,
during three years in a camp was medically tested a number of times,
including two blood tests.
2) Traditional sources of transplants-prisoners sentenced to death and
then executed, voluntary donors, the brain dead/cardiac alive-come
nowhere near to explaining the total number of transplants done in
China since 1999. There is no organized system of organ donations.
There is a cultural aversion to organ donation. There is no national
organ matching or distribution system.
The only significant source in China of organs for transplants before
the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners began in 1999 was
prisoners sentenced to death and then executed. The volume of organ
transplants in China went up dramatically shortly after the banning of
the practice of Falun Gong. Yet, the numbers of those sentenced to
death and then executed did not increase.
41,500 Unexplained Transplants
We estimate that 41,500 organs transplanted over the period of
persecution up to 2005 came from Falun Gong practitioners. How we
reached this conclusion is explained on page 96 of our book and also
in our report. We deducted from the 90,000 transplants a government
spokesman said were done over the period examined those which came
from executed criminals and other explained sources. The difference
was a dismaying 41,500. Consider how much money the regime and its
agents are making from organ sales and slave labour provided by Falun
Since our report came out, laws and practices in China have changed. A
law on transplants in May 2007 required that transplants be performed
only in registered hospitals.
The Ministry of Health announced that from June 26, 2007 Chinese
patients would be given priority access to organ transplants over
foreigners. The announcement also banned all medical institutions
from transplanting organs into foreign transplant tourists. The
government announced in August 2009 that it was launching an organ
donation system as a pilot project.
With these changes, however, the crime against humanity continues. The
recipients have changed from mostly foreign to local, but the sources
remain substantially the same. The government denies that organs are
being sourced from prisoners who are Falun Gong practitioners. Yet, it
accepts that organs for transplants are being sourced from prisoners.
The only debate we have with the Government is which group of
prisoners is the source of organs.
"Non consenting parties"
Sourcing of organs from prisoners is done without consent. Deputy
Health Minister Huang Jiefu in Guangzhou in November 2006 said in a
speech, "too often organs come from non consenting parties". The
government of China accepts that sourcing of organs from prisoners is
wrong. At the time of the announcement of an organ donor pilot
project, Huang indicated that executed prisoners "are definitely not a
proper source for organ transplants".
This principle, that prisoners are not an acceptable source for
organs, is followed by the Transplantation Society and the World
So what is the rule of law world going to do about the party-state’s
abuse of global transplant ethics? Our report and book have a long
list of recommendations. Given the shortness of time, I mention here
One is extraterritorial legislation. The 2007 policy giving priority
to Chinese patients has cut down on transplant tourism to China, but
such legislation would be a useful statement of universal principle.
The sorts of transplants in which the Chinese medical system engages
are illegal everywhere else in the world. But it is not illegal for a
foreigner from any country to go to China, obtain a transplant which
would be illegal at home, and then return home.
Foreign transplant legislation everywhere is territorial; it has no
extraterritorial reach. Many other laws are global in their sweep. For
instance, child sex tourists can be prosecuted not just in the country
where they abuse children, but often at home as well. This sort of
legislation does not exist for transplant tourists who pay for organ
transplants without bothering to determine whether the organ donor has
A second recommendation is that any person known to be involved in
trafficking in the organs of prisoners in China should be barred entry
by all foreign countries.
Nobel laureate economist Paul Krugman recently predicted that China’s
refusal to let its currency float will cause retaliation from the
European Union and elsewhere, where high unemployment can be traced in
part to Beijing’s ongoing failure to let the yuan rise and its focus
as well on manufacturing when so many economies are struggling with
The party-state continues to dump consumer goods-- no doubt including
many made in forced labour camps-- at lower-than-cost in foreign
markets. The manipulated yuan maintains an enormous competitive
advantage for China and keeps some workers from Manchester to Montreal
to Manila out of work.
Krugman adds that by displacing the products of foreign producers with
its own low-wage goods China is arguably the prime culprit in slowing
a robust recovery globally.
Peter Navarro, a professor at the University of California, says that
consumer markets across the world have been “conquered” by China
largely through cheating on trade practices. These include export
subsidies, widespread counterfeiting and piracy of products, currency
manipulation, and environmental, health and safety standards weakly
enforced. Navarro says new trade legislation by all of China’s trade
partners could help achieve fair trade through the following:
All economies must refrain from illegal export subsidies and currency
manipulation and abide by the rules of the World Trade Organization
For currency manipulation, he supports what the bi-partisan US-China
Commission has recommended to the American Congress: define it as an
illegal export subsidy and add it to other subsidies when calculating
anti-dumping and countervail penalties;
Every trade partner must respect intellectual property; adopt and
enforce health, safety and environmental regulations consistent with
international norms; provide decent wages and working conditions; and
effectively ban the use of forced labour;
Adopt a 'zero-tolerance' policy for anyone who sells or distributes
pirated or counterfeit goods;
Defective and contaminated food and drugs must be blocked more
effectively by measures which make it easier to hold importers liable
for selling foreign products that do harm to people or pets;
Despite growing criticism, China's party-state continues to trade its
UN Security Council veto for energy, raw materials and access to
markets from Angola to Burma to Zimbabwe. Increased monitoring and
exposure of its party-state activities everywhere is important;
To reverse the 'race to the environmental bottom' in China, require
all to compete on a level playing field and to reduce acid rain and
smog affecting populations abroad; all trade agreements should
henceforth include strong provisions for protection of the natural
The Chinese people want the same things as you, Canadians and people
everywhere, including, respect for all, education, to be safe and
secure, good jobs, the rule of law and a sustainable natural
environment. Living standards have improved on the coast and in other
urban areas in China, but there is a huge cost.
Most Chinese continue to be exploited by the party-state and firms,
often owned by or contracted for manufacturing to multinationals,
which operate today across their country like 19th century robber
barons. This explains partly why the prices of consumer products 'made
in China' seem so low—the externalities are borne by workers, their
families and the natural environment.
The attempted crushing of Falun Gong, Buddhist, Christian, Muslim and
other independent faith groups, human rights lawyers and other civil
society and democracy communities in recent years indicates that
China's party-state must still be engaged with great caution despite
the severe ongoing world economic problems.
If it stops the systematic and gross abuses of human dignity and takes
major steps to indicate that it wishes to treat its trade partners in
a mutually-beneficial way, the new century will bring harmony for
China, its trading partners and neighbours.
The Chinese people for whom, like you, I have the strongest admiration
have the numbers, perseverance, self-discipline, intelligence and
other qualities to help make this new century better and more peaceful
for the entire human family if given the opportunity.