Search this site powered by FreeFind

Quick Link

for your convenience!

Human Rights, Youth Voices etc.

click here


 

For Information Concerning the Crisis in Darfur

click here


 

Northern Uganda Crisis

click here


 

 Whistleblowers Need Protection

 

 

Turning Over a New Maple Leaf

By PETER VAN LOAN, The IRRAWADDY
April 21, 2008

Canadian MP Peter Van Loan is the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform in Canada. He recently offered the opening speech at the one-day Burma conference organized by the Canadian government in Quebec City.
 
The Irrawaddy spoke to Peter Van Loan on the upcoming referendum in Burma, Ottawa’s sanctions policy and its relationship with military-ruled Burma.

Question: How realistically do you expect to see change coming to Burma from tough sanctions on the military junta?

Answer: The tough sanctions play two roles: one is a symbolic statement representing Canada’s desire to see real change in respect of democracy, freedom and human rights in Burma. It’s also a tangible matter. We have seen, for example, in the precedent of South Africa, the international action that Canada was a leader in had a real effect in helping that country move out of Apartheid and into a situation of greater freedom and democracy. We hope that other countries in the international arena will engage and do the same as we have.

Q: Some critics say that the Canadian sanctions are not tough enough …

A: Well, they are the toughest sanctions in the world right now. Our priority in the near term must be to get as many other countries to do the same, especially countries that are closer and have more interaction with Burma than Canada does. So if we can get broad engagement from the international community the impact of those sanctions will be a lot stronger.

Q: What do you think when Burma’s neighbors—India, Thailand and China—continue to trade with and aid the Burmese military rulers? Do you oppose the constructive engagement policy with the Burmese military government?

A:  We obviously want to see them be constructive, but because of the positions that they’re in with stronger relations and interests, they have the potential to have the greatest impact and be constructive partners in this. And I know that there’s been some movement of a positive nature in the past, but there needs to be a lot more. So we’re very much looking toward countries that are closer to Burma to do as we have and make clear their desire for change through the imposition of sanctions and other measures.

Q: The US has imposed trade and “smart” sanctions on Burma, but Chevron is still there. What about Canadian investment in Burma? Is there a message to Canadian companies that are still investing in Burma?

A: There’s a clear rule that there will not be any more investment in Burma. That’s a strong signal to our business community already. But to upgrade our success rate now we want to support the efforts of the UN envoy, Ibrahim Gambari, to get more members of the international community engaged in the issue in a strong wave through sanctions.

Q: There has been a lot of strong criticism that the UN mission has been a complete failure and that there has to be a review of how the UN engages with the Burmese junta. What is your view on that?

A: There’s no doubt that it’s easy to find critics in a situation where, for decades, there’s been so much resistance to change. We prefer to focus on the positive elements that have occurred—the level of engagement. There have been some responses from the regime—imperfect though they may be—but the fact that the regime is now talking about a constitution, a referendum and elections represents a step in the right direction. What’s important now is to ensure that that process is corrected so that it involves genuine engagement for the opposition democratic forces and to ensure that any referendum or any elections are genuinely transparent.

Q: What is your government’s position on the referendum and the election?

A: We would like to see the flaws in the process being corrected, so that there is genuine engagement with the opposition; in the preparation of the question that goes in the referendum; in ensuring that any referendum be open and transparent; that there be genuine freedom of expression and participation; and that the elections have proper oversight and monitoring, so that any referendums or elections subsequent to that can have the confidence of the international community as well as the people of Burma.

There are concerns that what has been put on the table, and what has been proposed so far, has been done without adequate consultation with the democratic forces and the ethnic minorities in the country.

Q: The regime has put a lot of restrictions on NGOs working inside the country and also along the Thai and Indian borders. What is Canada’s take on the aid situation?

A: That’s a complicated question. In our sanctions policy we have carved out an exception for humanitarian aid. We don’t want to punish the Burmese people—we want to punish the Burmese government and get it to change.

Q: What is your message to Aung San Suu Kyi?

A: We gave Aung San Suu Kyi honorary Canadian citizenship last year, so we want to send her our support and encouragement. We also call on the Burmese government to release her and all other political prisoners.

Q: What about Burmese in Canada? Is there any plan to bring more Burmese into the country?

A: Our real priority now is to see Burmese not having to come to Canada to find freedom—they should be able to find freedom in Burma.

 

Home Books Photo Gallery About David Survey Results Useful Links Submit Feedback