Quick Link
for your convenience!
Human
Rights, Youth Voices etc.
For
Information Concerning the Crisis in Darfur
Whistleblowers
Need Protection
|
|
|
SPREADING DEMOCRACY - Why don't we start with China?
SPREADING DEMOCRACY - Why don't we start with China?
By BRUCE GILLEY
GLOBE AND MAIL (METRO),
Aug 17, 2007
It's time for Canada to get serious about its democracy promotion
efforts, and there's no better place to start than China, whose people
account for more than half of those around the world who are denied the
right to choose their own rulers. A parliamentary report issued in July
called for Canada to catch up to its Western counterparts and establish
an agency to promote democracy. Such organizations - examples include
Britain's Westminster Foundation for Democracy and the Norwegian Centre
for Democracy Support - help new democracies overcome obstacles to their
success and help authoritarian regimes make the transition to democracy.
Democracy promotion has been practised longest and most effectively
by the Nordic countries, but Germany, Taiwan and South Africa are other
recent entrants to the realm. The United Nations established a Democracy
Fund in 2005, with a total of $68-million (U.S.) pledged by 34 countries
so far.
Promoting democracy is consistent with the rights to political
participation laid out in the UN's human-rights instruments, to which
most members, including China, are party. But it also represents
hard-headed realism. Democratic states - even ones struggling to find
their feet - tend to be more prosperous, more stable, more co-operative
and less prone to war than authoritarian ones. The American misuse of
the notion of democracy promotion to excuse its national security
operation in Iraq has only increased the importance of countries such as
Canada stepping up with genuine efforts of their own.
But where to start? The U.S. think tank Freedom House reckons that
33 of the world's electoral democracies are still struggling to
consolidate, while another 45 countries remain autocratic. While
strategic and diplomatic considerations will necessarily constrain the
choices, the rough rule of thumb, which also informs the lending
activities of international institutions like the World Bank, is that
efforts should be directed roughly proportional to each country's
population. China's 1.3 billion people account for 53 per cent of the
people living in authoritarian regimes and 37 per cent of all those
living in either authoritarian regimes or unconsolidated democracies,
according to Freedom House.
Yet because of fears of damaging commercial ties to China, most
democracy promotion agencies (with the exception of the U.S. National
Endowment for Democracy) steer clear of China. For example, in the UN
Democracy Fund's first full year of operations, 2006, it doled out
$36-million for 125 projects. Not one of them concerned China. How could
any business that ignored a third to a half of its potential customers
be considered a success?
The parliamentary report of the Standing Committee on Foreign
Affairs and International Development, endorsed by both Liberal and
Conservative members, offers hope that Canada could make a start.
"Canada should carefully consider how it might support democratic
transition in China, the stirrings of which are already apparent," the
report says. An example of a place to start would be supporting Chinese
who are using the courts to push for expanded political rights.
Next year will mark the 40th anniversary of Pierre Trudeau's
statement of his intention to sever ties with Taiwan in favour of ties
with Beijing - a policy driven by prairie grain sales and the former
prime minister's bizarre romance with Maoism. Taiwan is now a thriving
democracy threatened by autocratic China. Putting China at the top of a
wider agenda of Canadian-style democracy promotion would be a great way
to start making amends for 40 years of unprincipled dealings with
Beijing.
BRUCE GILLEY is the author of
China's Democratic Future: How It Will Happen and Where It Will Lead.
|
|